{"id":180224,"date":"2026-08-27T07:35:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T05:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/?p=180224"},"modified":"2026-08-25T12:17:33","modified_gmt":"2026-08-25T10:17:33","slug":"new-rci-report-finds-that-no-single-method-fully-captures-biodiversity-in-life-cycle-assessments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/new-rci-report-finds-that-no-single-method-fully-captures-biodiversity-in-life-cycle-assessments\/","title":{"rendered":"New RCI report finds that no single method fully captures biodiversity in life cycle assessments"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

Biodiversity is increasingly recognised as a critical consideration in sustainability assessments. However, companies and researchers continue to face considerable challenges when attempting to quantify biodiversity impacts within life cycle assessments (LCA). <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new report by Renewable Carbon Initiative (RCI), supported by nova-Institute, provides a transparent overview and comparison of the most advanced methods currently available for assessing terrestrial biodiversity impacts in LCA.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report, \u201cBiodiversity in Sustainability Assessments – in Particular Life-Cycle-Assessments (LCA)\u201d, examines nine approaches developed or substantially advanced during the past decade. These include ReCiPe2016, IMPACT World+, LC-IMPACT, the Product Biodiversity Footprint, Biodiversity Impact Assessment+, BioMAPS, Global Extinction Potential, UNEP-GLAM and Biodiversity Value Increment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The methods are compared according to their coverage of biodiversity levels and the major drivers of biodiversity loss, as well as their data requirements, regionalisation, methodological characteristics and practical applicability. The review also considers whether the methods are available in established LCA software.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis shows that no single method currently covers all three dimensions of biodiversity, i.e. species, genetic and ecosystem diversity, together with all five major drivers of biodiversity loss: Land and sea-use change, climate change, pollution, direct exploitation of organisms and invasive alien species. While substantial methodological progress has been achieved, important gaps remain regarding data availability, uncertainty, impact-pathway modelling and interpretation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe have known for years that biodiversity is a critically important issue, but our ability to account for it in life cycle assessments remains limited,\u201d says Dr. Matthias Stratmann, Head of Sustainability at nova-Institut GmbH.<\/strong> \u201cThis work does not solve the problem, but it highlights which models and tools are currently the most advanced. Practitioners can use the methodology to select and apply suitable approaches, while researchers can build on their expertise to further develop these tools.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

For high-level biodiversity risk screening, the report highlights UNEP-GLAM and BioMAPS \u2013 once incorporated into the European Environmental Footprint methodology \u2013 as particularly relevant emerging approaches. At the same time, the authors recommend combining LCA methods with a broader assessment toolkit, including certification schemes, field measurements and other site-specific biodiversity evaluations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report also stresses that the choice of assessment method can directly influence the identification of environmental hotspots and, consequently, strategic priorities and resource allocation. The authors therefore recommend conducting sensitivity analyses using different methods. Due to the current uncertainties, biodiversity-related LCA results should not yet be used as the sole basis for consumer communication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report is the first part of a two-part series examining biodiversity in the context of biomass production and the bioeconomy. It is available at https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/publications\/product\/biodiversity-in-sustainability-assessments-in-particular-life-cycle-assessments-lca-rci-report\/<\/a>. The second part is expected to be published in autumn 2026.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Biodiversity is increasingly recognised as a critical consideration in sustainability assessments. However, companies and researchers continue to face considerable challenges when attempting to quantify biodiversity impacts within life cycle assessments (LCA). A new report by Renewable Carbon Initiative (RCI), supported by nova-Institute, provides a transparent overview and comparison of the most advanced methods currently available […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":59,"featured_media":180240,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","nova_meta_subtitle":"The comprehensive review of nine leading approaches provides guidance on current methods, finds real progress and priorities for further research","footnotes":""},"categories":[5572,24916],"tags":[14356,5838,5842,18372,15794,5528],"supplier":[4,17710],"class_list":["post-180224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bio-based","category-rci","tag-biodiversity","tag-bioeconomy","tag-biomass","tag-carbonfootprint","tag-lca","tag-sustainability","supplier-nova-institut-gmbh","supplier-renewable-carbon-initiative-rci"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/59"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180224"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":180486,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180224\/revisions\/180486"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/180240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180224"},{"taxonomy":"supplier","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supplier?post=180224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}