{"id":142984,"date":"2024-04-29T07:29:00","date_gmt":"2024-04-29T05:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/?p=142984"},"modified":"2024-04-24T13:40:24","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T11:40:24","slug":"should-plastics-be-recycled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/renewable-carbon.eu\/news\/should-plastics-be-recycled\/","title":{"rendered":"Should plastics be recycled?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

We need plastics for the critical services they provide. Plastics are now at the very base of Maslow\u2019s Hierarchy of Needs, underpinning modern healthcare, shelter, food, clothing, and even the mattresses we sleep on. They\u2019re fundamental to future energy systems. We might not need a plastic straw in every drink, but we don\u2019t know how to make a wind turbine without plastics.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yet, the current system is fundamentally unsustainable. Plastics were designed for a linear economy, made to be used and thrown away. Only 9% of plastic around the world is recycled (OECD<\/a> 2022). In some regions, more than half of plastic waste is mismanaged, ending up as pollution in the environment. The very characteristics that make plastics essential\u2014strength, durability, light weight\u2014make them an environmental nightmare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As if that\u2019s not enough of a problem, plastics are made mostly from fossil fuels. As we move towards Net Zero, the use of fossil fuels for chemicals, including plastics, has got to stop. RCI has already estimated that, by 2050, we should be getting 20% of our carbon from bio-based sources, 25% directly from CO2<\/sub>, 50% from recycling of those renewable sources, and 5% from recycling of fossil feedstocks. There\u2019s no space in this scenario for virgin fossil fuel plastics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>Recycling plastics leads to a buildup of contaminants<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There\u2019s a major problem with the fundamental concept of plastics recycling: we don\u2019t know what\u2019s in recycled plastics. We don\u2019t even really know what\u2019s in virgin plastics, since the supply chain is so opaque. When you buy a plastic toy, you\u2019re not told what the main polymer is, much less anything about additives or contaminants. When you buy recycled plastic, which may have come from a variety of virgin sources and been processed through multiple facilities and multiple methods, the problem is compounded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new paper<\/a> from the University of Gothenburg puts this problem under the spotlight. The team analysed 28 samples of recycled HDPE pellets and managed to quantify 491 organic chemical compounds. Since there are currently 13,000 chemicals known to be used in plastics production, that\u2019s not surprising. A third of the chemicals detected were pesticides and biocides. Another 18% were pharmaceuticals, 13% were industrial chemicals, and less than 10% were the expected plastic additives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The highest concentrations found were for deliberate additives, rather than accidental biocides, but it serves as a warning of the problem with the plastics supply chain. It\u2019s easy to see how this cocktail of additional chemicals could pose a problem if they make their way into, for example, children\u2019s toys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As more data like this comes out, it is clear that the system needs to be redesigned. Plant-based plastics may be part of the solution but are unlikely to solve every problem due to other considerations, such as the extent of processing required, chemical suitability for a particular application, and the impact of land use.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>There is no single solution to the plastics problem<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A multi-thread approach is required to mitigate our reliance on fossil carbon for generating plastics:<\/p>\n\n\n\n